6/30/08: I am currently working on version 3.0, with the intent of making a layout that's more friendly towards the user. I am completely redesigning the algorithm using a different programming language, so it will be a while before I am done. If you have questions, comments, or suggestions, post them here or here.
7/11/08: I promise to offer frequent updates on my progress on designing version 3.0. I know from a certain person named Michael Capewell that not getting updates is very annoying. Currently I am trying to learn Objective C, and I will make an evolutionary algorithm into an application. But first I have to learn the language. I am currently learning it very slowly, because I am lazy. I also have started making the keyboard program, and all I have so far is a little method that is hinting at possibly eventually becoming a mutation method.
8/6/08: My left thumb hurts. I think it's because my thumb now types shift and delete. My right thumb does not hurt though. Interesting. I tried to figure out a simple way to reduce thumb effort, but I don't see a good way. I'd have to either move shift or delete to a hard to reach position, or move a bunch of keys to put something in an easier position. I think the best thing to do would be to put shift where tab is, and put tab under the thumb. That would add more weight to the pinky, but it might help. (Look
here to see what I mean.) Oops, I can't edit the tab key. I'll figure something out.
8/12/08: I am trying to collect some concrete data, which is harder than it sounds. I might not remake the program in Objective C, or if I do, it will not be for a long time. It will probably be faster just to use the program as is, but with the new data implemented. The hard part is getting the data. I am trying to find out how long it takes to press each key, so I can put common characters on the keys that are pressed faster. Some finger weight lifting exercises could also help, but I'm not sure how to do that.
8/22/08: I got some keypress timing data for the QWERTY layout. I noticed that the keys that I typed fastest were the common ones, not the ones in good positions. There were a few anomalies though. I only collected data for 8 minutes, perhaps a longer trial would get better results.
GRAPH (lower is better)
QWERTY
? 4 1 1 3 2 4 3 6 7
1 4 2 3 6 1 5 5 5 8
6 7 6 2 7 1 3 4 7 ?
MTGAP's Layout 2.0
6 4 2 4 5 ? 6 3 4 5
3 3 2 2 2 4 5 1 3 3
6 5 7 4 7 2 5 6 7 ?
Colemak
? 6 6 5 6 2 5 1 4 ?
4 4 5 3 5 2 1 1 4 3
7 ? 7 1 7 4 5 3 4 ?
8/27/08: I just used Colemak for research purposes. I noticed that there was a lot more reaching inward, while my layout does more reaching upward. That was the major difference. I didn't like the positions of G or B.
9/7/08: I've made a new layout which I think is my best yet. It's more similar to Colemak. Link is above.
10/26/08: I seem to remember promising to provide frequent updates. Well I haven't updated in about two months. Yeah, two months isn't that long, but if I don't update now, when will I? Anyway, I have been working on some other projects, so it will be some time before I continue this project. And I might not even continue it. I have two layouts, both of which are very good for their own purposes. Even if I'm not completely satisfied, there's still a limit to how much more I can do. The layouts are basically as good as they're going to get.